smallbiab.jpg

HUMBER BRIDGE TOLL

 LET'S WORK TO REMOVE THE BARRIER TO UNITE BOTH SIDES OF THE BANK

In the North Lincs Labour manifesto we state that we will work with partners to remove or look to reduce the bridge toll, I have already started to have talks with the Hull & Humber Chamber for them to take the lead on lobbying with the support of the authorities in the Humber Region.

 

INFORMATION ON THE BRIDGE

The bridge's surface takes the form of a dual carriageway with a lower-level footpath on both sides, although traffic is often restricted to one lane both ways. There is a permanent 50mph speed limit on the full length of the bridge.

Each tower consists of a pair of hollow vertical concrete columns, each 155.5 metres (510 ft) tall and tapering from 6 metres square at the base to 4.5 x 4.75 metres at the top. The bridge is designed to tolerate constant motion and bends more than three metres in winds of 80 mph (36 m/s). The towers, although both vertical, are not parallel, being 36 mm further apart at the top than the bottom as a result of the curvature of the earth.[1]

The north tower is on the bank, and has foundations down to 8 metres (26 ft). The south tower is in the water, and descends to 36 metres (118 ft) as a consequence of the shifting sandbanks that make up the estuary.

There is enough wire in the suspension cables to circle the Earth nearly twice.

The bridge held the record for the world's longest single-span suspension bridge for 16 years from its opening in June 1981 until the opening of the Great Belt Bridge in June 1997 and was relegated to third place with the opening of the Akashi-Kaikyo Bridge in April 1998. It is now the fourth longest single-span suspension bridge after Runyang Bridge (China) which opened in 2005

FROM THIS

TO THIS

 

 

 

Sally
on  18 July 2007  at  10:48

The Humber Bridge is a great structure. I have a friend who works in Hull and she has found it cheaper to drive round via the M180 - M18 - M62 than actually cross the bridge. My Husband also works in Hull and buys the books of Tickets, though getting these proves quite difficult. You can buy them from the Local Link offices which is great if you can get there in the day you can also buy them from the Humber Bridge office on the Hull side of the bridge (however they only open late one night a week till 6pm) and you can buy them online which would suite us down to the ground however you have to pay £4.95 to have the delivered as they have to be signed for.. so the 10% off you get for buying online goes within a second. I agree with cutting the cost but also making it easier to buy tickets for the bridge would also save allot of time (could maybe one of the booths on the bridge sell them?).
Paul Taylor
on  02 August 2007  at  17:57

I'm soon to move to Lincoln but will continue to work in Hull. The bridge toll will cost me around £118 a month. I understand the bridge needs money to operate but £5.40 a day on tolls just seems too excessive (ontop of the £12 petrol a will use a day). My travel costs will amount to around £350 a month - abolotion of reduction of the bridge toll will help me so much. Surely something can be done. I also agree that the book of tickets is a total waste of time. After you've paid the £4.25 postage you have a massive saving of about £1.15p.........not worth the hassle. Maybe they should reduce the price of the books of tickets - then frequent users would see more of a benefit.
Trying not to be too dramatic here but i feel the tolls reduce quality of life. £118 a month could go towards a mortgage or a pension fund!
me
on  26 October 2007  at  22:04

good site
Mark Collier
on  29 March 2008  at  07:11

I wish the bridge board would reduce the cost of the toll and the government write of it's debt, I actually live in Hull and work in Immingham,though quite a good job I am thinking of moving from my present employers because of the toll,we are taxed all the way here so come on lets do some thing about it the cost to cross is really taking the fun out of commuting!!!!
Mark Collier
John Baron
on  11 April 2008  at  17:41

The sad thing is that the debt on the loan is being paid back by *local* people when these are the folk who should be using it for free - to improve trade etc. in the region.
I don't mind paying a modest toll, say a pound. I think the public wouldn't grumble with that.
As it stands the price of petrol means that it's still cheaper to cross from Barton instead of going down the M180 so I guess they can charge what they want.
Do you know how they paid off this sort of thing in other countries? A lottery! How about it chaps?

Comment on this entry

Registered users may login here




Graphical Security Code