smallbiab.jpg

The Code of Conduct treats political debate as an aberration

During this year I am still actively involved in e-democracy.  Last week's edition of Local Government Chronicle carried an article of mine, which I'm repeating here.

Citizens now expect to be able to google their elected representatives. Website management systems such as councillor.info, blogging platforms like ReadMyDay, even community online toolkits like Voice offer councillors easy routes to an online presence.  

 

Whichever method they choose, at some point councillors all come up against the Code of Conduct for Members. According to the Code, a member must not use council resources for political purposes.

 

Our democratic system is fundamentally adversarial. Government is all the better where the details are scrutinised and the principles are debated by a strong opposition.

 

So it seems very odd that the Code of Conduct appears to treat political debate as though it were an aberration rather than the lifeblood of the system.  However, the words that follow are often forgotten: “unless that use could reasonably be regarded as likely to facilitate, or be conducive to, the discharge of the functions of the authority or of the office to which the member has been elected or appointed”.

 

Councillors all use council resources whenever they speak at council meetings. I have yet to hear of a councillor who has been reported to the Standards Board for having made a political statement in a council meeting – that would be absurd.

 

In some councils, political discussions can be viewed on webcasts placed on council websites. Again, the use of this medium has never been challenged.

 

Yet many councils are extremely cautious about allowing councillors to use  council-supported web facilities ‘for political purposes’, even though we could argue that they are ‘likely to facilitate the discharge of the functions of the authority’.

 

The Local e-Democracy National Project has developed some very helpful guidance on the legal issues surrounding councillor’s websites. You can download it from www.edemocracy.gov.uk/knowledgepool/  (It is listed under C for Councillors’ Websites Legal Guidance)

 

In my view, councils are still erring too much on the side of caution. I would like to see real progress made on this issue in the next couple of years.  We need a clear recognition of the political role of councillors and a willing, not reluctant, acceptance of the political content of their websites.

 

Ironically, this is now my Mayoral year, so I have adopted a non-political stance in my blog, but I do see this as the exception. All councillors should be free to be  what they were elected to do – represent their residents and promote the policies that they presented in their manifestos.  

 

Doug
on15 June 2006at05:39

I see no reason why these cautious councils should break the rules simply on the basis that they break them in other situations. I would have thought councillors could afford paying nothing to use the multitude of free blogging facilities available.
Oh, but wait - dont councillors expect laptops at home, a paid-for-by-the-council broadband connection, and personal training on how to use such equipment? And you then expect to be able to use these council resources to blog party/personal political views?
If only such opportunity were given to the least well off in your borough to enable them to tell the world what problems they have in being heard by their elected representatives.
You should be embaressed that you get access to a hugely expensive national project to bypass such CoC rules. Its a disgraceful waste of public money that would be better spent by either yourself or your party.
Andrew Brown
on20 June 2006at18:41

I think you're largely missing the point here Doug. The laptops and the broadband are provided so that constituents can get in touch with councillors, and councillors can progress casework.
No one as far as I can tell thinks that's a bad idea, and no one that I know of thinks that councillors emails should be vetted before their sent out in case they say something political.
Councillor blogs and other social software are an attempt to take some of that conversation between politician and constituent into the public realm.
Where I do agree with you is that there isn't as much value in the Read My Day branding as I suspect the originators of the project would have liked.
As for the point about making technology available to everyone I don't know about Kingston, but where I live the Libraries try to do just that.

Comment on this entry

Registered users may login here




Graphical Security Code


About me
Liberal Democrat Councillor for Chessington North & Hook, in the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames
More about me
« May 2008 »
  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31

winner-elected-office.png

winner-best-designed.png

sl_bestblogpost.png

New Statesman New Media