smallbiab.jpg

South of the Borough, 13th June

I really should have blogged earlier about last Wednesday's South of the Borough Neighbourhood Meeting, especially as it was the first one I'd chaired.

A number of people who live in Tedder Close, Gibson Close and Mansfield Road wanted to tell us about problems they've been having with uneven pavements, blocked drains and refuse collections. We were able to tell them that Tedder and Gibson had been put on the schedule for pavement replacement at the previous week's meeting, so that was one good outcome. We asked the officers to look into the other problems and get back in touch with them directly, keeping the councillors in the loop.

It struck me that this was exactly why we have Neighbourhood Committees - to give citizens a space where they can voice their opinions and identify problems to the Council. I wrote about 'What are Neighbourhoods for?' only last month.

Most of the agenda was taken up with planning applications. The extension to the Premier Travel Inn was permitted, and the proposed development on the site of The Harrow was refused. The application for 21 houses to be built on 44-56 Leatherhead Road turned out to be quite controversial. Residents in Sussex Gardens, whose homes back on to the site, were very concerned about the flooding they have endured in the past and whether this development would make the problems worse. We decided to defer the application and asked for further reports on drainage.

The Neighbourhood was also asked to pass comments on two applications which will be heard by Development Control Committee. One was for some sensible changes to the original plans for access to the new Chessington Community College. The other was for a depot for Quadron, the Council's Parks contractor, at the back of the bowling club on King George's Field.

Annette Pindard
on  30 June 2007  at  05:13

The residents at the meeting are of the opinion that it was a full flood risk assessment that was requested by Cllr Ian Reid and the application was defered on these grounds. On consultation with MP Edward Davey he requested in writing to the planning department, with copies to you all, that the flood risk assessment should include the impact on properties in Sussex Gdns.
Also we are greatly concerned that as Sussex Gnds is built on a flood plain the recent pictures on TV of flooding around the country gives us real fears that our homes are at risk by any construction that reduces permeable land as shown in the proposed development.
Even though the policy of the Liberals Democrats is against back garden developments,we are worried that the committee will ingore this policy and local residents concerns because of planning penalties.
on  30 June 2007  at  10:24

0star(s) awarded
Yes, it is essential that we all have a full picture of the flood risk, with an eye on the wider impact, not just the one related to this application. This is being taken seriously by the Council officers.
We've now heard that the developer will not be able to get his report in time for the meeting in July so will be deferred until Septemeber.

Comment on this entry

Registered users may login here




Graphical Security Code


About me
Liberal Democrat Councillor for Chessington North & Hook, in the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames
More about me
« July 2009 »
  • Su
  • Mo
  • Tu
  • We
  • Th
  • Fr
  • Sa
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • .



winner-elected-office.png

winner-best-designed.png

sl_bestblogpost.png

New Statesman New Media