A question of blackmail
Can anyone explain to me why the Royal victim of blackmail, and his employee, were given anonymity by the courts? Blackmail trials are fairly rare, so is this normal practice? Or were they given special protection because of the Royal links?
I'm all for protecting victims, but I sincerely hope this was not special treatment.
Of course, anyone interested has been able to google and find out the names for ages. And any viewer of 'Have I Got News for You' would have noticed the juxtaposition of questions at around the time when the story broke.
Comments: 6
: 0
I can't think of any other instances...
I don't fancy a spell in the Tower so will be cautious and not publish your comment for now.
To be honest a very minor Royal if you ask me, sells papers compared to man with Royal ties....!





